Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. Google Pixel 4's body has the same weight than LG G7 ThinQ, but it's a little bit thicker. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has more pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 features a bit better performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments, a much better 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G7 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.