Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ, having a score of 82.9 against 81. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL is newer than the LG G7 ThinQ, it's just a little thicker and heavier. LG G7 ThinQ features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a bit better pixel density.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better processing power than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with higher video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G7 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG G7 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.