Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 82.9 score against 81. These devices come with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Google Pixel 4a is just a little thicker than LG G7 ThinQ, it's somewhat lighter and notably newer.
LG G7 ThinQ has a better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much greater storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G7 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG G7 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.