Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 89 score against 81. Google Pixel 5's body has the same thickness than LG G7 ThinQ, but it is a little bit lighter. LG G7 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 5, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 5 has a much better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4080mAh battery size against 3000mAh. LG G7 ThinQ shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a lot higher 16 mega-pixels resolution camera and a larger aperture for better low-light photography.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G7 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG G7 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.