Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 6a, getting a overall score of 81 against 76.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Google Pixel 6a has Android 12, offering some additional features. LG G7 ThinQ's design is a bit lighter and thinner than the Google Pixel 6a, although it was released 4 years before.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a way better display than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a greater screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a very superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores. The Google Pixel 6a counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4410mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG G7 ThinQ takes a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG G7 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.