Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | -- |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | -- |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has an overall score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) body is incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner than the LG G7 ThinQ. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has 14 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G7 ThinQ features a lot better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher screen pixel density and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much faster processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a really longer battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.