Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is much better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 general score. These phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a heavier phone than LG G7 ThinQ, but both of them have the same thickness.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixel number in each inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better processor than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
LG G7 ThinQ features a greater memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a way better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.