Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a general score of 83.1, which is a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's overall score of 81. Motorola Edge 30 Neo's design has the same thickness than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it is just a bit lighter. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has an older 12 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a higher display density. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo shoots slightly better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with better 120 frames per second video frame rates and a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has improved battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 34 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.