Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than the LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 83.4 score against 81. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the previous 13 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is newer than the LG G7 ThinQ's, but it is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and less brightness, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way better video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.