Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G has a score of 81.5, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 overall score. The Moto G 5G design is noticeably newer than the LG G7 ThinQ's, although it is a lot thicker and notably heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Moto G 5G has older 10 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. LG G7 ThinQ has a much more vibrant display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Moto G 5G captures clearer videos and photos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in low-light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a camera with way more MP.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.