Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 global score. The LG G7 ThinQ design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it was released 5 years before. These devices come with Android OS, but LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version, so it gives some additional features and optimized performance.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a way better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
LG G7 ThinQ features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) takes clearer pictures and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor capturing lot worse quality videos and photographs, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a lot higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a very superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.