Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ, having an 86.2 score against 81. The Motorola Moto G200 5G design is newer than LG G7 ThinQ's, although it is thicker and heavier. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
Moto G200 5G features just a little better performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a much longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.