Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-01 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, with an 81 score against 75.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version, counting with some extra features and increased performance. The LG G7 ThinQ is a newer and a little bit lighter phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, although it's just a little bit thicker.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a higher number of cores (and also faster). LG G7 ThinQ features a sharper screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a little bigger display and a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Moto Z Force and LG G7 ThinQ both have similar memory capacity to install applications and games, they have an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and exactly the same internal storage.
The Moto Z Force features a bit longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG G7 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.