Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 81 score against 77.4. LG G7 ThinQ's body is newer, but heavier and notably thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. LG G7 ThinQ has a brighter screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a bit bigger display and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 16 mega pixels resolution, a larger aperture and higher video frame rate.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition and LG G7 ThinQ both count with similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal memory capacity. LG G7 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
The LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.