Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 overall score. The Motorola One 5G body is a lot newer than the LG G7 ThinQ's, but it's somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. The LG G7 ThinQ features a little faster processor than Motorola One 5G. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much better screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. Motorola One 5G counts with a superior camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low-light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Motorola One 5G has a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G7 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.