Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a global score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 global score. Although the Motorola One 5G Ace is incredibly newer than LG G7 ThinQ, it is extremely thicker and much heavier. LG G7 ThinQ features a little faster processor than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
LG G7 ThinQ has a much sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater pixels amount in each display inch. Motorola One 5G Ace captures a bit better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low light situations and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace has a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G7 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G7 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.