Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting an 81 score against 79.8. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, giving lots of additional features. LG G7 ThinQ is an older phone than the Motorola One Hyper, but LG made it lighter and thinner anyway.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a greater pixels amount in each screen inch.
Motorola One Hyper features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper features improved battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG G7 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.