Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Vision's global score of 80.7. Although the LG G7 ThinQ is older than the Motorola One Vision, it's design is just a bit thinner and lighter. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Vision. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores. LG G7 ThinQ has a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Vision shoots much better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photography, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.