Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ, having a global score of 81.1 against 81. The Motorola razr (2022) is a incredibly newer and just a bit thinner phone than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it is somewhat heavier. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2022) has the previous 12 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a greater pixel amount in each display inch. The LG G7 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a bit better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.