Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with an 81 score against 75.8. Even though the LG G7 ThinQ is older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's design is thinner and much lighter. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System), so they should provide identical OS features.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better hardware performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S captures much clearer photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a way better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.