Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with an 81 score against 76.2. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features. Even though the LG G7 ThinQ is notably older than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot brighter display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos, a lot higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a much higher video resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a much longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG G7 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.