Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ, with a global score of 83.1 against 81. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has 10 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though OPPO Find X2 Pro is newer than the LG G7 ThinQ, it's thicker and extremely heavier.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better processing power than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen and a little bit brighter screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.