Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | -- |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, with a overall score of 81 against 76.2. The LG G7 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy A16 5G, but it is somewhat lighter. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14, providing you some additional features.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more display brightness, a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater pixel density. Galaxy A16 5G features a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a very superior processor than Galaxy A16 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. The LG G7 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a back camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a much better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.