Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. Galaxy A31's construction is newer, but heavier and just a little bit thicker than the LG G7 ThinQ. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A31 has 10 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G7 ThinQ features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A31. Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display.
LG G7 ThinQ has a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A31 shoots a bit better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera and a way larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy A31 has a much longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.