Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-01 | -- |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 general score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A34 has the older 13 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A34 is a thinner and a lot lighter device than LG G7 ThinQ.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A34. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG G7 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A34 has a much better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG G7 ThinQ shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor and a lot lower resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.