Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 global score. LG G7 ThinQ's design is just a little thinner and incredibly lighter than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version, giving a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a way brighter display. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.