Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 general score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a newer and a bit thinner phone than LG G7 ThinQ, but it's also a bit heavier. The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
LG G7 ThinQ features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per display inch and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ has a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a lot less MP camera and a tinier back camera sensor, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos in low-light situations and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A50 costs more money than LG G7 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.