Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a newer and just a bit thinner phone than LG G7 ThinQ, although it is a little bit heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G7 ThinQ features a brighter display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and more pixels per inch of display. The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A50s has better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A50s captures better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.