Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. Samsung Galaxy A52's construction is noticeably newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than the LG G7 ThinQ. The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Galaxy A52, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better display density. Galaxy A52 features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A52 has a very superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 50% bigger battery size. Galaxy A52 takes much better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.