Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 global score. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A52s's design is much newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than the LG G7 ThinQ.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a better display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little bit better memory capacity for apps and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The LG G7 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A52s, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much longer battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A52s counts with a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.