Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy A6, with an 81 score against 75.8. LG G7 ThinQ's body has the same weight than the Galaxy A6, but it's just a bit thicker. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a quite bigger screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a much higher pixels density. LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
The LG G7 ThinQ captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality photographs, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a lot higher video quality.
Galaxy A6 and LG G7 ThinQ both feature similar battery performance.
Although LG G7 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. If you want to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A6, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.