Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. The LG G7 ThinQ is a somewhat lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A70, but they are 0.31inches thick. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
The LG G7 ThinQ has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The LG G7 ThinQ has a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photos, and they both have the same video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much longer battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG G7 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.