Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-01 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, with a global score of 81 against 78.4. LG G7 ThinQ is a newer and just a little bit lighter cellphone than Galaxy C7 Pro, but it is just a little bit thicker. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version, providing some nice extra features and optimized performance.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores. LG G7 ThinQ has an incredibly better display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bit larger display, a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixels quantity per display inch.
The LG G7 ThinQ captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 MP resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a way higher video quality and a bigger aperture. LG G7 ThinQ counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy C7 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.