Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy F62 is a a lot newer phone than the LG G7 ThinQ, although it's thicker and noticeably heavier.
LG G7 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more brightness, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a greater pixels density. The Galaxy F62 features a bit more memory to store more games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. Galaxy F62 captures better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy F62 has a way better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 133% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.