Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has a general score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 global score. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Galaxy M30's construction is newer than the LG G7 ThinQ's, but it is just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
LG G7 ThinQ has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG G7 ThinQ has a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M30, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Galaxy M30, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. LG G7 ThinQ shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a better 16 MP resolution back camera, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a larger sensor taking higher quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a much longer battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.