Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 563 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 global score. Samsung Galaxy M51's body is noticeably newer than LG G7 ThinQ's, although it's noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has older 10 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M51, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M51 takes much better pictures and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a way more mega-pixels camera.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a slightly bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M51 has a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 133 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.