Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than LG G7 ThinQ, having a 90.8 score against 81. The Galaxy Note 20 construction is noticeably newer than LG G7 ThinQ's, but it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a sharper display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution. Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a much less MP back camera and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a way better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G7 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.