Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 general score. The LG G7 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is a little bit lighter. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a little higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a little bit greater display pixels density.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The LG G7 ThinQ captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate, a much more mega pixels camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 7% more battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG G7 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.