Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 89 score against 81. The Galaxy Note10 construction has the same thickness than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it's just a little heavier. LG G7 ThinQ features a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note10 has a bit better CPU than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ counts with more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 16 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G7 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the LG G7 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.