Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is much better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a newer phone than LG G7 ThinQ, but it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a little better processing power than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos and a way more megapixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a really longer battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.