Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, with an 89.1 score against 81. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a just a bit heavier device than the LG G7 ThinQ, but both have the same thickness. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has an older 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The Galaxy S21 FE has a bit better processor than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has more RAM.
LG G7 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a much more megapixels back camera and a larger camera aperture for better low light photos.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G7 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, else you can save some money and get the LG G7 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.