Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | -- |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy S24 FE, with a score of 81 against 76. LG G7 ThinQ's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy S24 FE, but it's much lighter. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14, giving lots of additional features and improved performance.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has much more opaque screen and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG G7 ThinQ has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
LG G7 ThinQ takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture. LG G7 ThinQ features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG G7 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.