Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | -- |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than LG G7 ThinQ, with a 90.7 score against 81. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and way lighter phone than the LG G7 ThinQ. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little bit better screen than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower pixels density and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, it also counts with a lot brighter screen and a bit bigger display. LG G7 ThinQ has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 200 MP resolution camera and a much higher video resolution.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a really longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.