Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 general score. LG G7 ThinQ's body is much lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released 4 years before. These phones come with Android operating system, but LG G7 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and increased performance.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
LG G7 ThinQ has a much faster processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 35% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.