Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 563 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The LG G7 ThinQ body is noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released about 22 months before.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit worse display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited environments and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
The LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.