Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 81 score against 81. LG G7 ThinQ's body is thinner and incredibly lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro, even though it was released about 20 months before. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
LG G7 ThinQ features a better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG G7 ThinQ has a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery size. The LG G7 ThinQ takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs and a larger diafragm aperture.
LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.