Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 85.6 score against 81. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a noticeably newer and thinner device than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it's somewhat heavier.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher number of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G7 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.