Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the LG G7 ThinQ, getting a 90.6 score against 81. Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is extremely newer and thinner, but noticeably heavier than LG G7 ThinQ. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ has a much better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG G7 ThinQ shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot bigger aperture for better photography in low light environments. The LG G7 ThinQ features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.