Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ, getting a global score of 83.8 against 81. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is better than LG G7 ThinQ, we must highlight that it's also somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, more pixels per screen inch and a little larger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ takes slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates, a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little longer battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G7 ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.