Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with a general score of 81 against 80.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. The LG G7 ThinQ design has the same thickness than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it is just a little lighter.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has much more memory for applications and games than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 192 GB more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, LG G7 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.